
The global demand for SUVs has soared, particularly in the era of electric vehicles (EVs). The additional space available beneath the cabin for batteries has made SUVs the most sought-after vehicle type in the market. Volkswagen has developed a modular platform known as MEB (Modular Electric Drive Matrix) that accommodates a wide variety of vehicle shapes and designs.
Currently, most MEB models are SUVs, with only the VW ID.3, Cupra Born, and ID.Buzz standing apart. This article will delve into the similarities and differences among the trio of popular electric SUVs based on the MEB platform: the VW ID.4, Audi Q4, and Skoda Enyaq iV.
VW ID.4, Audi Q4 and Skoda Enyaq - the tripletsCommon Features
All three electric SUVs share the MEB platform, which implies that many engineering aspects are common across the models. This shared architecture results in similar rigidity and expected passive safety levels. Notably, all models utilize drum brakes on the rear axle, an advanced five-link rear suspension, and an independent front McPherson strut suspension with lower wishbones.
The motors utilized in these vehicles are also consistent, with the rear-wheel-drive versions featuring a permanent magnet synchronous motor at the back. All-wheel-drive variants include an additional asynchronous induction motor at the front.
In terms of technology, all three vehicles come equipped with the latest generation of Volkswagen Group’s infotainment systems, along with the corresponding generation of mobile online services. A notable feature available as an option for all MEB vehicles is the augmented reality head-up display.
MEB platform is the backbone of the SUVs from VW GroupDistinctive Features
Despite sharing the same platform, each model boasts a unique design, which subsequently affects their aerodynamic performance. The Skoda Enyaq iV coupe version showcases the best aerodynamic capabilities, featuring a drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.23—a considerable achievement for an SUV. Conversely, the Audi Q4 Sportback and VW ID.5, which is the coupe version of the ID.4, achieve a Cd of 0.26, indicating that the sleeker design of coupe models enhances aerodynamics.
Top class aerodynamics for Skoda Enyaq Coupe and its illuminated front grillThere are also variations in the available powertrains. For example, the basic 109 kW motor is exclusive to the Skoda Enyaq iV and VW ID.4 models. The 132 kW motor is reserved for the mid-tier variant of the Skoda Enyaq, while both the VW ID.4 and Audi Q4 use a 125 kW version. The all-wheel-drive variants come in 195 kW and 220 kW options for the Enyaq and ID.4, while the Audi Q4 offers only the 220 kW variant. Although all three models feature a basic 52 kWh battery pack, the mid-range 58 kWh battery is only available in the VW and Skoda models; Audi does not offer this option.
Different interior philosophy among the three automakersThe most significant differences among the three vehicles are found in their interiors, with each brand employing its own design philosophy—such as Skoda’s Clever Series and Audi’s luxury features. VW and Skoda share a nearly identical layout driven by a prominent free-standing infotainment screen and a compact 5.3-inch digital instrument display behind the steering wheel.
Audi adopts a unique style with a larger 10.25-inch digital instrument panel that can also display maps, a slightly smaller embedded infotainment screen, and a dedicated climate control interface. In contrast, VW and Skoda integrate climate control within the infotainment system.
Regarding cargo capacity, the Skoda Enyaq leads with 585 liters, followed by the VW ID.4 with 543 liters, and the Audi Q4 with 520 liters. In terms of exterior design, the Skoda features a distinctive illuminated grille, while Audi includes a unique digital lighting signature complemented by Matrix LED headlights.
Audi Q4 has a unique digital light signature thanks to Matrix headlightsConclusion
Volkswagen’s decision to launch a trio of similar models is strategic. The key specifications remain consistent enough to minimize production overhead, yet each vehicle offers sufficient unique features to satisfy a broader audience. Although this multiplicity may complicate the decision-making process for buyers, it ultimately provides an advantageous variety.