Recent research has revealed alarming concentrations of a toxic chemical, perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), in smartwatch bands from top brands including Apple, Google, and Samsung. The study primarily focused on bands made from fluoroelastomer, known for its water-resistant and durable properties. Unfortunately, these characteristics come at a potential health risk as the chemical can be absorbed through the skin, particularly during physical activity when sweating occurs. The tested brands encompass a diverse range of options for consumers, including:
Despite expectations, researchers expressed surprise at the significantly higher levels of PFHxA detected compared to other products. Various product specifications confirm that popular bands, such as Apple Sport bands and Samsung's Galaxy Watch series, utilize fluoroelastomer. Notably, some Galaxy Watch bands, including the Ultra Marine and Ultra Peakform models, are made from HNBR (Hydrogenated Nitrile Butadiene Rubber), which does not carry the same risks as fluoroelastomer.
The detection of PFAS chemicals in commonplace items like smartwatch bands raises questions about the prevalence of these harmful substances in other consumer goods, highlighting the need for greater awareness and proactive avoidance.
- Apple
- Apple/Nike
- CASETiFY
- Fitbit
- KingofKings
- Modal
- Samsung
- Tighesen
- Vanjua
Despite expectations, researchers expressed surprise at the significantly higher levels of PFHxA detected compared to other products. Various product specifications confirm that popular bands, such as Apple Sport bands and Samsung's Galaxy Watch series, utilize fluoroelastomer. Notably, some Galaxy Watch bands, including the Ultra Marine and Ultra Peakform models, are made from HNBR (Hydrogenated Nitrile Butadiene Rubber), which does not carry the same risks as fluoroelastomer.
The potential hazard posed by these chemicals is concerning, particularly given the widespread use of smartwatches. To mitigate potential risks, researchers recommend opting for watch bands made from materials other than fluoroelastomer. Consumers should be vigilant by checking product descriptions for materials such as “Viton” or “FKM,” which indicate the presence of fluoroelastomer. Although these alternative materials might be less common, especially among those seeking durable and water-resistant options, prioritizing health over convenience is essential.
The detection of PFAS chemicals in commonplace items like smartwatch bands raises questions about the prevalence of these harmful substances in other consumer goods, highlighting the need for greater awareness and proactive avoidance.
