Tecno Pova Neo 2 vs Pova 4 Pro
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.82-inch Tecno Pova Neo 2 (with MediaTek Helio G85) that was released on September 26, 2022, against the Tecno Pova 4 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova Neo 2
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
Reasons to consider the Tecno Pova 4 Pro
- 56% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (400K versus 257K)
- 53% higher pixel density (403 vs 263 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 18W)
- More energy-efficient CPU – MediaTek Helio G99
- AMOLED display (versus competitor''s IPS LCD)
- Reverse charging feature
- 40% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 734 and 524 points
- Weighs 19 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (
*
) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Value for money
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.82 inches | 6.66 inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels | 1080 x 2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | - | 20:9 |
| PPI | 263 ppi | 403 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 450 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.1% | 83% |
Design and build
| Height | 170.86 mm (6.73 inches) | 164.79 mm (6.49 inches) |
| Width | 77.79 mm (3.06 inches) | 77 mm (3.03 inches) |
| Thickness | 9.63 mm (0.38 inches) | 9.19 mm (0.36 inches) |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Orange | Gray, Blue, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | Yes, in-button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max clock | 2000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture |
- 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 48 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~96 GFLOPS | ~281.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 10
| CPU | 79926 | 130933 |
| GPU | 46637 | 52553 |
| Memory | 59931 | 115339 |
| UX | 68740 | 101459 |
| Total score | 257586 | 400762 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Stability | 98% | 99% |
| Graphics test | 4 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | 742 | 1254 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 6580 | 8018 |
| Video editing | 6244 | 6283 |
| Photo editing | 15003 | 24335 |
| Data manipulation | 5455 | 6788 |
| Writing score | 9803 | 13158 |
Memory
| RAM size | 4, 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64, 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 512 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| ROM | - | HiOS 8.6 |
Battery
| Capacity | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | - | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 55 min) | Yes (50% in 24 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:20 hr | - |
Camera
| Matrix | 16 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8190 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Lenses | 2 (16 MP + 2 MP) | 2 (50 MP + 2 MP) |
| Wide (main) lens |
- 16 MP
- Pixel size: 0.8 micron |
- 50 MP
- Phase autofocus |
| Depth lens |
- 2 MP
|
- 2 MP
|
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode |
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features |
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features |
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC * | Depends on the region | Yes |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM * | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support * | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat * | - | 13 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | - | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2022 | October 2022 |
| Release date | October 2022 | October 2022 |
| Sensors |
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 18 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Disclaimer!
NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Tecno Pova 4 Pro is definitely a better buy.