Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Galaxy A10e
Here we compared two smartphones: the 5.8-inch Samsung Galaxy S9 (with Exynos 9 Octa 9810) that was released on February 25, 2018, against the Samsung Galaxy A10e, which is powered by Exynos 7 Octa 7884 and came out 17 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S9
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- 93% higher pixel density (568 vs 295 PPI)
- Handles Qi/PMA wireless charging up to 10W
- Supports 15W fast charging
- Optical image stabilization
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR4X 1794 MHz
- Fingerprint scanner
- Has 2x more RAM: 4GB versus 2GB
- Stereo speakers
- More energy-efficient CPU – Exynos 9 Octa 9810
- Super AMOLED display (versus competitor''s PLS TFT)
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy A10e
- Comes with 400 mAh larger battery capacity: 3400 vs 3000 mAh
- The phone is 1-year and 5-months newer
- Weighs 22 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (
*
) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Value for money
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | PLS TFT |
| Size | 5.8 inches | 5.83 inches |
| Resolution | 1440 x 2960 pixels | 720 x 1560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 18.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 568 ppi | 295 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max rated brightness | 658 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | No |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6% | 81.4% |
| Display features | - Always-On Display | - |
| PWM | 240 Hz | - |
| Response time | 7 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 147.7 mm (5.81 inches) | 147.3 mm (5.8 inches) |
| Width | 68.7 mm (2.7 inches) | 69.6 mm (2.74 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 141 g (4.97 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | No |
| Rear material | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame material | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | Black, Gold, Gray, Blue, Purple | Black, Gold, Blue, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, rear | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9810 | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 |
| Max clock | 2700 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture |
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.9 GHz: Exynos M3 |
- 6 cores at 1.35 GHz: Cortex-A53
- 2 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
| Lithography process | 10 nanometers | 14 nanometers |
| Graphics | Mali-G72 MP18 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 324 | 32 |
| GPU clock | 572 MHz | 770 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~370.6 GFLOPS | ~49.3 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
AnTuTu Benchmark 10
| CPU | 141516 | - |
| GPU | 136666 | - |
| Memory | 82698 | - |
| UX | 92188 | - |
| Total score | 457170 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Performance
| Max surface temperature | 39.2 °C | - |
| Stability | 93% | - |
| Graphics test | 13 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2272 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 5108 | - |
| Video editing | 5490 | - |
| Photo editing | 9516 | - |
| Data manipulation | 5720 | - |
| Writing score | 6311 | - |
Memory
| RAM size | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory clock | 1794 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 400 GB | Up to 512 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 8.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 10) | Android 9.0 (Can be upgraded to Android 10.0) |
| ROM | One UI 2,1 | One UI 1.0 |
| OS size | 14 GB | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 3000 mAh | 3400 mAh |
| Max charge power | 15 W | - |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes, Qi/PMA (10 W) | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (40% in 30 min) | No |
| Full charging time | 1:35 hr | 1:40 hr |
| Web browsing | 06:04 hr | - |
| Watching video | 10:57 hr | - |
| Gaming | 02:42 hr | - |
| Standby | 70 hr | - |
General battery life
Camera
| Matrix | 12 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 240FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (720p) | No |
| Lenses | 1 (12 MP) | 1 (8 MP) |
| Wide (main) lens |
- 12 MP
- Aperture: f/1.5 - 2.4 - Focal length: 26 mm - Pixel size: 1.4 micron - Sensor: 1/2.55", Samsung SAK2L3 (ISOCELL CMOS) - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
- 8 MP
- Aperture: f/1.9 - Focal length: 27 mm |
| Camera features |
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode |
- |
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 2560 x 1920 |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 32 mm |
| Pixel size | 1.22 microns | - |
| Sensor type | ISOCELL CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" | - |
| Video resolution | 1440p at 30 FPS | 720p at 30 FPS |
DxOMark camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic camera score
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features |
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features |
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou |
| NFC * | Yes | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM * | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support * | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | No |
| LTE Cat * | 18 | 4 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | February 2018 | July 2019 |
| Release date | March 2018 | August 2019 |
| SAR (head) | 0.362 W/kg | 0.14 W/kg |
| SAR (body) | 1.18 W/kg | 0.77 W/kg |
| Sensors |
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor
- Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
*
Disclaimer!
NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy S9 is definitely a better buy.